A year ago this week, the nerds
of Historical Nerdery posted a pair of articles discussing American efforts to starve British forces out of
Boston. Today we’d like to go into a little more detail about the forage
operations of May, 1775.
Following the Battles of
Lexington and Concord, the Massachusetts Grand Army surrounded Boston and began
to lay siege to it. The Massachusetts Committee of Safety quickly recognized
that in order to drive the British army from Boston, it had to starve them out.
On May 7, 1775, the Committee
passed a resolution ordering selectmen and Committee of Correspondence members
for Chelsea "to take effectual methods for the prevention of any
Provisions being carried into the Town of Boston."
The British military had a
longstanding practice of supplementing troops’ rations with fresh meat and
produce that it purchased from local farmers. If these supplies were cut off,
Gage would be forced to depend upon a long and tenuous line of communication to
British possessions in Nova Scotia and, ultimately, back to England. To
complicate matters, Gage’s Atlantic supply lines would be exposed to the
privateer wolf packs of Newburyport, Salem and Plymouth.
At first, Gage contemplated
purchasing supplies from American farmers who lived on the islands in Boston
Harbor. Unfortunately, many yeomen were reluctant to cooperate. As farm manager
William Harris noted, he was “very uneasy, the people from the Men of War
frequently go to the Island to Buy fresh Provision, his own safety obliges him
to sell to them, on the other Hand the Committee of Safety have threatened if
he sells anything to the Army or Navy, that they will take all the Cattle from
the Island, & our folks tell him they shall handle him rufly.” Thus, Gage
decided he would initiate operations to forcefully seize supplies.
On May 10, 1775, Elijah Shaw
testified before the Massachusetts Committee of Safety. The farmer testified
that a British detachment of fifty men visited his farm and seized a large
number of animals and five tons of hay, He also reported that he had heard
rumors “the Troops would soon make a push either towards Dorchester Neck or
Chelsea.”
American commanders found
themselves unprepared to respond to these foraging operations. Initially the
Massachusetts Committee of Safety proposed ““that all the live-stock be taken
from Noddle’s Island, Hog Island, and Snake Island, and from that part of
Chelsea near the seacoast, and be driven back.” However, the Committee failed
to secure troops from nearby communities to carry out the instructions.
Afterwards, the Committee turned to a New Hampshire regiment to take up
defensive posts on the various islands and prevent supplies from falling into
British hands. The was the 1st New Hampshire Regiment under the command of John
Stark. Unfortunately, Stark reported that his unit could not carry out the
mission because it was too poorly equipped. After receiving this news, the
Committee of Safety resumed debate on how to best undertake interdiction
operations.
Gage took advantage of the
American confusion and continued to send out foraging parties. On May 21st, he
enlisted the support of Vice Admiral Samuel Graves, and dispatched an armed
schooner, two sloops and a detachment of one hundred troops to Grape Island.
The island, incorporated within
the town of Hingham, was owned by Elisha Leavitt, a wealthy loyalist who had
previously offered or sold the supplies to Gage. The vessels’ approach alarmed
the neighboring towns. General John Thomas, in command of the provincial
militia at Roxbury, sent three companies to a point of land across from Grape
Island. The militiamen opened fire on the island but, given the range, had
little effect beyond drawing a response from the ships’ cannons. Eventually,
the regulars had escaped, taking with them what they could.
In response, the militiamen torched Leavitt’s barn and eighty tons of
hay still inside, and seized the remaining livestock.
Provincial leaders scrambled to
find a way to prevent further such raids and stop the flow of supplies into
Boston. The Committee of Safety drafteda new resolution to the Massachusetts
Provincial Congress on May 23, 1775. The Committee urged the Provincial
Congress to use its authority to secure resources on the harbor islands and
Massachusetts seacoast. The next day, the Committee issued a second resolution,
stating "Resolved, That it be recommended to Congress immediately to take
such order respecting the removal of the Sheep and Hay from Noddle’s Island, as
they may judge proper, together with the stock on adjacent islands."
In compliance with the
Committee of Safety resolutions, Major General Artemas Ward, commander-in-chief
of the army surrounding Boston, convened a council of war to discuss removing
or destroying all supplies on Noddle’s and Hog Islands. From this meeting a
plan would be formulated regarding the removal of resources from some of the
nearby Boston Harbor islands.
British spies quickly gathered
intelligence and passed it on to Gage. In a note to Vice Admiral Graves dated
the morning of May 25th, the British commander reported “I have this moment
received Information that the Rebels [intend] this Night to destroy, and carry
off all the Stock & on Noddles Island,for no reason but because the owners
having sold them for the KingsUse: I therefore give you this Intelligence that
you may please to
order the guard boats to be
particularly Attentive and to take such Other Measures as you may think
Necessary for this night.”
In response, Graves recommended
landing “a Guard upon the Island [as] the Most probable Means of preserving the
Hay from being destroyed.” That evening there was an attempt to send a
detachment over to Noodle’s Island. However, as Lieutenant John Barker of the
King’s Own Regiment noted “50 Men order’d last night; did not go on account of
the tide not serving.”
No comments:
Post a Comment